ARTICLES
IN
FAMILY LAW, HOW IS MEDIATION DIFFERENT
FROM A SETTLEMENT MEETING?
By Norman Pickell, LLB. ©March 2000
Mr. Pickell is a lawyer and mediator based in Goderich, Ontario.
He can be reached at 519-524-8335 or nbpickell@odyssey.on.ca
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Introduction
Steps in Family Mediation
Lawyer's Role in Family Mediation
Mediator's Role in Family Mediation
Communication
Exchanging Positions
Exploring Interests and Needs
Generating Options
Children
New Partners
Results
Benefits of Family Mediation
not found in Settlement Meetings
Added Benefits of Mediation Where
There are Children
Advantages of Family Mediation for
Lawyers
So You Now Think Mediation Might Just
Be Worth a Try
Introduction:
"I arrange
Settlement Meetings for clients. My success rate of settling the case
at or shortly after the Settlement Meeting is pretty good. Therefore,
I don't need to worry about Mediation! Besides, Mediation would just
add more cost to my client's separation/divorce." Does that
sound familiar ?
Sometimes I hear
lawyers make the above comment when the possibility of Family Mediation
is raised. But there are several differences between Settlement Meetings
and Family Mediation. (Since the procedure used in Family Mediation
is much different from that used in non-family situations, I am confining
this article to mediation of family law issues.)
In a typical Settlement
Meeting, the clients and their lawyers meet in a neutral place. Usually
Client # 1 is in one room, Client # 2 is in another room, and the lawyers
meet in a third room. Lawyer # 1 talks to Client # 1. Lawyer # 2 talks
to Client # 2. Lawyer # 1 then talks to Lawyer # 2. Each lawyer then
talks to his or her own client, and so on. There is never any direct
communication between the clients.
Family Mediation,
on the other hand, has the clients meet face-to-face, usually in the
absence of their lawyers, with a trained family mediator present. Of
course, this only happens after some pre-mediation screening has been
done by the family mediator to make sure that the couple are suitable
for mediation and that neither party is put in danger by such a face-to-face
meeting.
Before proceeding
further, let me make one thing clear. Lawyers still have a very important
role to play in Family Mediation. Mediation does not
eliminate the need for each party to have her or his own lawyer. (More
will be said later about the lawyer's role.)
Divorce is ranked
at the top of the list of stressful events in one's life. However, Settlement
Meetings have one purpose - to effect a settlement of the outstanding
legal issues involving the clients. Emotions and post-separation/divorce
dynamics are rarely factored into Settlement Meetings.
But if the parties
have children of any age, the parties must consider more than just reaching
a settlement. The parties need to recognize that a relationship will
exist between them after the divorce. This relationship will be tested
time and again, even after the children have left the nest and are out
on their own. There will be birthdays, graduations and other school-related
activities, weddings, and children, funerals and other important events
that will require some contact between the parties. Co-operation between
the parents will go a long way in reducing the stress and anxiety in
the lives of their children. As parents cope better, their children
do so as well.
Even when there
are not any children, Family Mediation can still assist the parties
to dissolve their relationship where there has been a decision made
to separate.
Constant fighting,
arguing and blaming in a marriage or similarly committed relationship
generally leads to more of the same while dissolving it. unfortunately,
the consequences of continuing this behaviour can be dramatic, including
protracted litigation, escalating costs, and significant damage to the
parties' children's emotional well-being. By the time the parties are
in their lawyers' offices, they usually dislike each other, are very
poor communicators, are highly distrustful, and are fearful of being
hurt again.
But it does not
have to be this way. People do have a choice about how to separate !
Solving disputes through negotiation is a part of everyday life. However,
Family Mediation is more than just bringing in a neutral third person,
ie. a mediator, to help the parties reach a settlement.
What is "mediation"
? There are many definitions. One of the better ones that I like is
found in the State of Louisiana Mediation Act:
"…a
procedure in which a mediator facilitates communication between the
parties concerning the matters in dispute and explores the possible
solutions to promote reconciliation, understanding and settlement."
Thus, "settlement"
is only one of the purposes of mediation. "Reconciliation"
does not mean "getting back together." It means helping the
parties negotiate a workable way of living apart.
Mediation is a process
- a voluntary, non-adversarial, process involving a trained, impartial
third party. The parties, not the mediator, make the decision. The mediator
has no power to render a decision or to force the parties to accept
a settlement. Because the voluntary settlement that the parties reach
is designed by the parties themselves, it is more likely to be carried
out without the need for external enforcement or further litigation.
Return
to Contents
Steps
in Family Mediation:
Generally, my family
mediation is conducted as follows:
- After I pre-screen
the parties, I encourage them to each have separate lawyers (if they
don't already).
- Following my
initial meeting with their lawyers in the absence of their clients,
I have my first joint meeting with the parties.
- I then have an
individual meeting with each party separately, following which I have
further joint meetings with the parties.
- In some cases,
I interview the children separately from their parents.
- In appropriate
cases, I will meet with new partners.
- I meet with both
lawyers from time to time as needed.
- When the parties
reach an agreement, I prepare a Memorandum of Understanding. After
I have reviewed the draft with the parties, I send it to their lawyers
to review with the clients. Once everyone is content with the Memorandum
of Understanding, it becomes the Separation Agreement.
Return
to Contents
Lawyer's
Role in Family Mediation:
Unlike other types
of mediation, lawyers do not usually attend mediation sessions with
their clients in Family Mediation. Mediation changes the role of lawyers
from adversarial negotiators to legal consultants. The parties become
the primary negotiators in mediation.
The role of the
lawyers is to advise their clients throughout the mediation process
on their legal rights and obligations. (Even if the mediator is a lawyer,
the mediator does not provide legal advice to the parties.) The parties
cannot make competent and informed decisions without sufficient legal
advice. The lawyers will also review the Memorandum of Understanding
and see their clients sign the Separation Agreement.
Return
to Contents
Mediator's
Role in Family Mediation:
A mediator is a
neutral person who is trained to help people talk so that the parties
can better understand their problems and reach an agreement. A mediator
does not take the side of either party, and does not pass judgment on
the parties or their problems.
The function of
the mediator is to manage the process for the parties, to get them talking,
to help them better understand the problems and to help them reach a
solution that meets their needs. The mediator keeps the conversations
going and focused. Where there is a will to address
conflicts constructively and creatively, mediators provide the necessary
skill..
The mediator sets
the tone for the negotiations. Right from the beginning, the mediator
tries to create an atmosphere conducive to discussion. In Settlement
Meetings, there is usually a certain amount of posturing." On the
other hand, the mediator will discourage intimidation, threats or bottom-lining.
The mediator can remind the parties to take a more co-operative and
less competitive approach. Because the parties have usually experienced
a significant breach of trust, responding to trust issues is one of
the most challenging tasks for a mediator.
The emotional consequences
of the breakdown of relationships in family disputes cannot be overstated.
Lawyers who are working hard to advocate for their clients may miss
the emotional significance of some of the matters that cause the most
grief and about which a person becomes most intransigent. Family mediators
consider the emotions and the feelings that the parties are experiencing
which can be a significant obstacle to settlement.
Mediation does not
mean "giving in" or "giving up". Mediation clients
are no "nicer" than the ones who go to court. The difference
is the process: in a positive environment, the parties find practical
solutions that work for both of them.
Mediation can be
effective even when conflict and anger is high, and communication has
broken down. Some people are concerned that they will not be able to
negotiate effectively with the other party and then they will lose.
But with a trained mediator, the parties can trust that they are not
going to be abused or taken advantage of by the other party.
Return
to Contents
Communication:
Settlement Meetings
do not usually involve communication directly between the parties. In
mediation, on the other hand, the parties talk to each other, with the
mediator present. Direct negotiation between the parties generally expedites
the resolution of issues.
One of the most
common complaints from parties entering mediation is that they cannot
communicate with each other. Therefore, the trained family mediator
will focus on communications and improved understanding. The more people
understand each other, the more likely they can begin the process of
talking constructively about the issues in dispute.
Return
to Contents
Exchanging
Positions:
It is important
for each party to understand the position of the other, even if he/she
does not agree with it. Therefore, in mediation, each party relates
the issue as she/he sees it. The mediator probes into the underlying
and often unspoken issues. The underlying issues may be the deep-rooted
reason for the party's stand. The mediator encourages the parties to
talk about their feelings. This is not done in Settlement Meetings.
When the feelings have been expressed and heard, the
parties may be more willing to talk about a way to resolve the issues.
The aim of Settlement
Meetings is to make a determination of rights. Usually a settlement
is reached based on the law and the lawyers' interpretation of the facts.
The law is not trying to have each side understand the position of the
other. Very little is said in Settlement Meetings about underlying issues.
Return
to Contents
Exploring
Interests and Needs:
A position
is what a party wants or demands. An interest is why
a party has taken a particular position. Much of the mediation process
is devoted to exploring the parties' respective interests, rather than
a positional approach to negotiation. The focus on interests in mediation
changes the way in which the dispute is characterized, analyzed and
processed. An agreement is unlikely to result from a consensual process
unless the discussion can be moved beyond positions stated in rights-based
terms, and explore how the conflict arose, the expectations of either
side, and uncover what is critical to each side in seeking a resolution.
Return
to Contents
Generating
Options:
Lawyers often excel
in developing facts that support their positions, but bog down when
it comes to developing settlement options.
Mediation recognizes
that both parties have legitimate needs and helps develop options that
will successfully reconcile those needs to the satisfaction of both
parties. A mediator can explore suggestions as to available options
that have not been previously considered.
Once the parties
have identified their options, they can assess their merit and begin
to negotiate their acceptance. Here the mediator often serves to facilitate
communication, test realities and offers encouragement to the parties.
Return
to Contents
Children:
Family mediation
focuses on plans for the future of the children, rather than on the
parents' conflicts and grievances. The mediator can emphasize a co-operative
parenting approach.
In Settlement Meetings
involving custody and access, for example, agreements generally focus
on legal rights. Negotiations between lawyers do very little to clarify
ongoing parental responsibilities. On the other hand, mediation provides
a forum for parents to structure their own unique parenting plan.
While Settlement
Meetings do not usually include the children, often the mediator will
meet privately with the children (but only with the approval of both
parents). Children may have their own questions and concerns, and have
needs that are quite different from their parents' needs.
Mediation can also
help the parties explain the situation of their separation to their
children in a constructive fashion. This is not done in a Settlement
Meeting.
Return
to Contents
New
Partners:
New partners are
not usually included in Settlement Meetings. This can be a highly explosive
subject (for the parties and for their children) if it is not dealt
with. Often this topic is discussed in mediation.
Return
to Contents
Results:
The legal system
concerns itself with the facts, and the results will often be black
and white. In mediation, on the other hand, the parties are sometimes
able to reach a solution that is more creative than that which a court
would impose.
You need to consider
the future relationship of the parties. This is where mediation can
be a big help. In situations where the parties wish to preserve or improve
their relationships, mediation is more likely to create a forum for
frank exchange leading to a better working association, rather than
either ignoring issues or using more formal approaches.
Return
to Contents
Benefits
of Family Mediation not found in Settlement Meetings:
- negotiations
take place with the assistance of a third party mediator
- both parties
are made to feel safe and comfortable in each other's presence
- allows the
parties to take charge of their lives and design a plan for their
future that would be good for themselves and for their children
- facilitates,
promotes and improves communication between the parties
- hard bargaining
tactics are avoided
- helps the
parties to exchange views and information
- helps to
reduce conflict and hostility between the parties
- encourages
co-operation and trust
- allows the
parties the opportunity to express their feelings associated with
ending the marriage
- the position
of the other party is not filtered through lawyers
- the parties
have more control over the outcome
- increases
potential for solutions that may go beyond remedies which can be ordered
by the court
- mediated
settlements generally work better because of the fact that the parties
worked co-operatively to arrive at the agreement, rather than having
it negotiated back and forth between their lawyers
- preserves
family relationships; a Settlement Meeting will not tell the parties
how to do that can
make termination of a relationship more amicable and less traumatic
- empowers
the parties to solve their own dispute and find a compromise that
works for both of them
- a mutually
acceptable solution lets both parties be winners and respect each
other
- the parties
can deal with the issue of new partners
- can and should
make post-divorce relations easier among the parties and extended
family
- provides
a way for families who are splitting into parts to learn to deal with
the changes in roles, duties and opportunities and to face those changes
with emotional balance
Return
to Contents
Added
Benefits of Mediation Where There are Children:
- focuses attention
on the children and in doing what is best for the children
- minimizes the
harmful effects of divorce and separation on children
- courts deal with
custody and access; mediators deal with parenting plans; parenting
is a lifelong commitment that transcends court orders; children need
both parents
- agreements reached
through mediation can take into account the personal needs of children
in much more detail than other kinds of agreements
- may involve children
when their input is appropriate and helpful
- children of parents
who mediate adjust better to their parent's divorce than do children
of parents who simply go through the Settlement Meeting or litigation
process; the children are happier, more secure, more reassured, and
less distressed
- presents a co-operative
model for addressing future changes in the lives of the children
- establishes a
sound foundation for post-separation parenting arrangements
Return
to Contents
Advantages
of Family Mediation for Lawyers:
We have talked about
the benefits of mediation for the parties. There are also advantages
of Family Mediation for their lawyers. Lawyers will have clients who
are generally more satisfied by the experience of crafting their own
resolution. Satisfied clients are more appreciative of the lawyer's
services and spread the word. This causes more clients to seek out that
lawyer for similarly satisfactory results. Lawyers representing clients
in mediation are more likely to be paid their full fee. On the other
hand, the lawyers who go the traditional route of settlement meetings
and litigation often do not bill their full fee, or they often do not
collect all the money that they do bill their clients. Thus, while lawyers
may bill fewer gross dollars to an individual client, they collect a
higher percentage of what is billed and get more business as a result
of satisfied clients.
Return
to Contents
So
You Now Think Mediation Might Just Be Worth a Try:
Statistics indicate
that over 80 % of all mediations result in settlement. This is true
even where all prior attempts at settlement have failed, where the parties
were pessimistic about the prospects of settlement, and where the parties
have spent substantial amounts of time and money preparing for trial.
With such a success
rate, it is wise and relatively inexpensive to try mediation. You have
little to lose.
In those few cases
where no agreement is reached, the parties still retain the flexibility
to walk away from mediation and go to, or continue with, court.
For those who want
to learn more about mediation in the context of separation and divorce,
there are two excellent books available. One is entitled Family
Mediation: A Guide for Lawyers by Cinnie Noble, published in 1999
by Canada Law Book Inc. The other is Family Mediation Handbook,
2nd Edition, by Dr. Barbara Landau, Dr. Mario Bartoletti and Ruth
Mesbur and published in 1997 by Butterworths Canada Ltd.
Norman Pickell
is a lawyer and mediator based in Goderich, Ontario. Mr. Pickell welcomes
comments and response to this article at 519-524-8335 or nbpickell@odyssey.on.ca
Return
to Contents
FOR
CONFLICT RESOLUTION SERVICE OR
MORE INFORMATION CLICK HERE
Elgin
Counselling & Mediation Centre
19 Queen Street, St. Thomas, Ontario, Canada N5R 3H9
Phone: (519) 633-4423 | Fax: (519) 633-3240